When you attend court, you are deemed dead! A legal fiction….a trust!

Courts, Names and the Cestui Que Vie Trust
Jul 08, 2011

My position on going to court has always been: never voluntarily go to court. Live men
and women are not meant to be in any place designed solely for the business of fictional
entities. When we attend court, we are deemed dead, in fact, they cannot deal with us
until we admit to being dead….a legal fiction….a trust. Court is for titled persons: judge,
prosecutor, defendant, bailiffs, cops, and attorneys. Live men and women are not
recognized, so it makes sense to send in a dead person––an attorney––to handle our cases
…. except for one thing: they do not know how the system works, due to their
indoctrination. If you can find one to do as you say, then you will prevail, but most of
them would rather hang onto their BAR cards than behave honourably. The only thing
that dead, fictional entities want from us is our life energy, and the only way they can get
it is by our agreement. Without us, they cannot function, so, they are desperate to get us
into court, to have us pay the debt which they created by charging the trust.
Since common law courts no longer exist, we know that the case never has anything to do
with “facts” or live men and women and so, anyone who testifies (talks about the facts of
the case) is doomed. ALL courts operate in trust law , based upon ecclesiastical canon
law–– ritualism, superstition, satanism, etc.––which manifests as insidious, commercial
law and we are in court to take the hit, if they can get us to do so. They use every trick in
the book––intimidation, fear, threat, ridicule, rage, and even recesses, in order to change
the jurisdiction, when they know they are losing, in order to make us admit that we are
the name of the trust. When we do so, we are deemed to be the trustee––the one liable for
administering the trust. Ergo, until now, it has been a waste of our time, energy, and
emotion to go to a place where it is almost certain that we will be stuck with the liability.
We all know from our indoctrination, programming, and schooling that judges are
impartial and have sworn an oath to this effect. This means he must not favour either
plaintiff or defendant. But, our experience reveals that he does, indeed, favour the
plaintiff, indicating a glaring conflict of interest––that the prosecutor, judge, and clerk all
work for the state––the owner of the CQV trust. So, as the case is NOT about “justice”, it
must be about the administration of a trust. They all represent the trust owned by the state
and, if we are beneficiary, the only two positions left are Trustee and Executor. So, if you
detect the judge’s partiality, although I doubt the case will get this far, you might just
want to let them know that you know this.
If you consider court as entertainment and if you can stand the evil emanating from its
officers, the fear and angst oozing from the walls, and the treacherous atmosphere, then
go, knowing that under trust law we cannot be the trustee or the executor of a trust, whilst
being beneficiary, as that would be a conflict. The position of beneficiary may lack clout,

but the other positions hold liability. Since state employees want to be the beneficiaries of
the trust, the only way they can do so is to transfer, to us, the liability which they hold, as
trustees and executors, because they also cannot be both the administrators and
beneficiary of the trust. So, trusteeship and executorship, i.e.: suretyship, becomes a hot
potato and everyone wants to toss it so s/he can be beneficiary of the credit from the trust.
When we were born, a trust, called a Cestui Que Vie Trust (“CQV”) was set-up, for our
benefit. Evidence of this is the birth certificate. But what is the value which must be
conveyed to the trust, in order to create it? It was our right to property (via Birth into this
world), our body (via the Live Birth Record), and our souls (via Baptism). Since the
state/province which registered the trust is the owner, it is also the trustee…. the one that
administers the trust. Since they, also, wanted to be beneficiary of this trust, they had to
come up with ways to get us, as beneficiary, to authorize their charging the trust,
allegedly, for our benefit (via our signature on a document: citation, application, etc.),
and then, temporarily transfer trusteeship, to us, during the brief time that they want to be
the beneficiary of a particular “constructive” trust.
This means that a trust can be established anywhere, anytime, and the parties of the trust
are quickly, albeit temporarily, put into place. But, since a beneficiary cannot charge a
trust––only a trustee can do so––it is the state that charges the trust, but they do so for
their benefit, not ours (albeit occasionally we do reap some benefit from that charge but
nowhere near the value which they reap. Think bank loan….. we reap a minute
percentage of what they gain from our authorization). So, the only way, under trust law,
for them to be able to charge the trust is to get the authorization from the beneficiary––us,
and the only way for them to benefit from their charge is to get us to switch roles––from
beneficiary to trustee (the one responsible for the accounting), and for them to switch
their role––from trustee to beneficiary because no party can be both, at the same time,
i.e.: within the same constructive trust. They must somehow trick us into accepting the
role of trustee. Why would we do so when the trust is for our benefit? …. and how do
they manage to do this?
Well, the best way is to get us into court and trick us into unwittingly doing so. But, if we
know what has transpired, prior to our being there, it is easy to know what to say so that
this doesn’t happen. The court clerk is the hot shot, even though it appears as if the judge
is. The clerk is the trustee for the CQV owned by the state/province and it is s/he who is
responsible for appointing the trustee and the executor for a constructive trust––that
particular court case.
So s/he appoints the judge as trustee (the one to administer the trust) and appoints the
prosecutor as executor of the trust. The executor is ultimately liable for the charge
because it was s/he who brought the case into court (created the constructive trust) on
behalf of the state/province which charged the CQV trust. Only an executor/prosecutor
can initiate/create a constructive trust and we all know the maxim of law: Whoever
creates the controversy holds the liability and whoever holds the liability must provide
the remedy. This is why all attorneys are mandated to bring their cheque-books to court
because if it all goes wrong for them…. meaning either they fail to transfer their liability
onto the alleged defendant, or the alleged defendant does not accept their offer of
liability, then someone has to credit the trust account in order to off-set the debt. Since
the prosecutor is the one who issues bogus paper and charges the trust, it is the
Prosecutor/Executor (“PE”) who is in the hot-seat.
When the Name (of the trust), e.g.: JOHN DOE, is called by the Judge aka Administrator
aka Trustee (“JAT”), we can stand and ask, “Are you saying that the trust which you are
now administrating is the JOHN DOE trust?” This establishes that we know that the

Name is a trust, not a live man. What’s the JAT’s first question? “What’s your name?” or
“State your name for the record”. We must be very careful not to identify with the name
of the trust because doing so makes us the trustee. What does this tell you about the
judge? If we know that the judge is the trustee, then we also know that the judge is the
Name, but only for this particular, constructive trust. Now, think about all the times that
JATs have become so frustrated by our refusal to admit to being the Name that they issue
a warrant and then, as soon as the man leaves, he is arrested. How idiotic is that? They
must feel foolish for saying, “John Doe is not in court so I’m issuing a warrant for his
arrest” and then, the man whom they just admitted is NOT there is arrested because he IS
there. Their desperation makes them insane. They must get us to admit to being the name,
or they pay, and we must not accept their coercion, or we pay. Because the JAT is the
trustee––a precarious position, the best thing to say, in that case, is “JOHN DOE is,
indeed, in the court!” Point to the JAT. “It is YOU! As trustee, YOU are JOHN DOE,
today, aren’t you?!”
During their frustration over our not admitting to being a trust name––the trustee and/or
executor of the trust, we ought to ask who they are.
 “Before we go any further, I need to know who YOU are.” Address the clerk of
the court––the trustee for the CQV trust owned by the state/province,
 “Are you the CQV’s trustee who has appointed this judge as administrator and
trustee of the constructive trust case #12345? Did you also appoint the
prosecutor as executor of this constructive trust?”
 Then point to the JAT: “So you are the trustee”, then point to the prosecutor,
“and you are the executor? And I’m the beneficiary, so, now we know who’s
who and, as beneficiary, I authorize you to handle the accounting and dissolve
this constructive trust. I now claim my body so I am collapsing the CQV trust
which you have charged, as there is no value in it. You have committed fraud
against all laws!”
 Likely, we will not get that far before the JAT will order “Case dismissed” or,
even more likely, the PE, as he clings tightly to his cheque-book, will call, “We
withdraw the charges”.

We have exposed their fraud of the CQV trust, which exists only on presumptions.
The CQV has no corpus, no property, ergo, no value. Trusts are created only upon the
conveyance of property and can exist only as long as there is value in the trust. But,
there is no value in the CQV trust, yet, they continue to charge the trust. That is fraud!
The alleged property is we men and women whom they have deemed to be
incompetent, dead, abandoned, lost, bankrupts, or minors, but that is an illusion so, if
we claim our body, then we collapse the presumption that the trust has value. They
are operating in fraud––something we’ve always known, but now we know how they
do it. Our having exposed their fraud gives them only three options:
1. They can dissolve the CQV trust––the one for which the clerk of the court is
trustee and from which s/he created a constructive trust––the case––for which s/he
appointed the judge and prosecutor titles which hold temporary liability––trustee and
executor, respectively. But they cannot dissolve the CQV or the entire global system

will collapse because they cannot exist without our energy which they obtain via that
CQV trust.
2. They can enforce the existing rules of trust law which means, as trustee, they can
set-off their debt and leave us alone. Now they know that we are onto their fraud and
every time they go into court to administer a trust account, they will not know if we
are the one who will send them to jail. The trustee (judge) is the liable party who will
go to jail, and the executor (prosecutor) is the one who enforces this. This is why they
want us to take on both titles, because then, not only do we go to jail but also, by
signing their paper, we become executor and enforce our own sentence. They cannot
afford to violate the ecclesiastical canon laws, out of fear of ending their careers, so
they are, again, trapped with no place to run.
3. They can dismiss the cases before they even take the risk of our exposing their
fraud …. which also makes no sense because then their careers, again, come to a
screeching halt.
What’s a court clerk to do!? Pretty soon, none of these thugs will take any cases
because the risk is too great. This will be the end of the court system. ‘Bout bloody
time, eh?
Knowledge––not procedure––is power.
The means by which we have attempted to assuage our problems, inflicted upon us by
the PTW (powers that were) have all been superficial, compared to the origins of all
the black magic, superstition, satanic ritualism, trickery, mind-control, and
clandestine practices. Under commercial law, dating back to the Code of Ur-
Nammu––around 2100 BCE––the use of another’s property without permission puts
one into dishonor and makes him liable for any debts. So, our using UCC forms, bills
of exchange, AFV, or bonds, and altering documents of the Roman System can create
penalties, as this is trading and/or using the property of a corporation we do not own
…. the birth certificate proves that the “name” is, in fact, the property of the
corporation which issued it. We can do all the paper perfectly but, in the end, they
say, “Sorry; you’re not one of us.” But, now, we get to inflict fear onto them. When
we are forced to court, knowing that the Judge acts as the Trustee and the prosecutor
acts as Executor of the CQV Trusts is empowering. It gives us two choices:
1. If we wish to expose the fraud of presumptions, by which the CQV trusts still exist,
then the court is the perfect opportunity to have them dissolved or to prove the fraud
because the Trustee is sitting on the bench. Dissolving the first CQV, dissolves them
all; or,
2. If we are not inclined to use something like the Ecclesiastical Deed Poll to expose
the fraud of the CQV Trusts, then, at least, we ought to know that everything the
judge says––even if it sounds like a command, order, or sentence––is actually an
offer which we can choose to decline (“I do not consent; I do not accept your offer”).
This is a fundamental principle of testamentary trusts…… the beneficiary can accept
or decline what the trustee offers.
For 15 years, I have watched the alleged solutions in commerce come and go and
nothing has worked for enough people on enough occasions to call anything a
consistent win. Paying for information is insanity because those who sell information
clearly have not prevailed or they wouldn’t need to sell anything, would they? Buying
express, private-contract trusts, e.g.: NACRS, is a huge waste of time and money
because the entire process is too complicated for anyone with an IQ below 400 and
…. “no refunds”. I have found no solution in commerce because those who claim to

have solutions still insist upon treating symptoms rather than curing the cause––the
fraudulent CQV trust.
If we send an Ecclesiastical Deed Poll (see: http://one-
heaven.org/canons_positive_law/article_1330.htm ), as response to a summons or
arrest warrant, then the judge who issues them has to think long and hard: “Am I
willing to gamble that the man who walks into my court might call me on my role of
trustee and expose the fraud that the CQV Trusts are still in place?
Canons of Positive Law: http://one-heaven.org/canons_positive_law/article_0000.htm
This knowledge is your power. –– Frank O’Collins

History of Trusts
http://one-heaven.org/home.asp
The 1st Trust of the world
Unam Sanctam is one of the most frightening documents of history and the one most
quoted as the primary document of the popes claiming their global power. It is an express
trust deed. The last line reads: “Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is
absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman
Pontiff.” It is not only the first trust deed in history but also the largest trust ever
conceived, as it claims the whole planet and everything on it, conveyed in trust.
Triple Crown of Ba’al, aka the Papal Tiara and Triregnum
In 1302 Pope Boniface issued his infamous Papal Bull Unam Sanctam––the first Express
Trust. He claimed control over the whole planet which made him “King of the world”. In
celebration, he commissioned a gold-plated headdress in the shape of a pinecone, with an
elaborate crown at its base. The pinecone is an ancient symbol of fertility and one
traditionally associated with Ba’al as well as the Cult of Cybele. It also represents the
pineal gland in the centre of our brains––crystalline in nature–– which allows us access to
Source, hence, the 13-foot tall pinecone in Vatican Square. Think about why the Pontiffs
would idolize a pinecone.See: Pharmacratic Inquisition:

The 1st Crown of Crown Land
Pope Boniface VIII was the first leader in history to create the concept of a Trust, but the
first Testamentary Trust, through a deed and will creating a Deceased Estate, was created
by Pope Nicholas V in 1455, through the Papal Bull Romanus Pontifex. This is only one
of three (3) papal bulls to include the line with the incipit “For a perpetual remembrance.”
This Bull had the effect of conveying the right of use of the land as Real Property, from
the Express Trust Unam Sanctam, to the control of the Pontiff and his successors in
perpetuity. Hence, all land is claimed as “crown land”. This 1st Crown is represented by
the 1st Cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is born. It deprives us of all beneficial
entitlements and rights on the land.
The 2nd Crown of the Commonwealth
The second Crown was created in 1481 with the papal bull Aeterni Regis, meaning

“Eternal Crown”, by Sixtus IV, being only the 2nd of three papal bulls as deeds of
testamentary trusts.
This Papal Bull created the “Crown of Aragon”, later known as the Crown of Spain, and
is the highest sovereign and highest steward of all Roman Slaves subject to the rule of the
Roman Pontiff. Spain lost the crown in 1604 when it was granted to King James I of
England by Pope Paul V after the successful passage of the “Union of Crowns”, or
Commonwealth, in 1605 after the false flag operation of the Gunpowder Plot. The Crown
was finally lost by England in 1975, when it was returned to Spain and King Carlos I,
where it remains to this day. This 2nd Crown is represented by the 2nd cestui Que Vie
Trust, created when a child is born and, by the sale of
the birth certificate as a Bond to the private central bank of the nation, depriving us of
ownership of our flesh and condemning us to perpetual servitude, as a Roman person, or
slave.
The 3rd Crown of the Ecclesiastical See
The third Crown was created in 1537 by Paul III, through the papal bull Convocation,
also meant to open the Council of Trent. It is the third and final testamentary deed and
will of a testamentary trust, set up for the claiming of all “lost souls”, lost to the See. The
Venetians assisted in the creation of the 1st Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540, to use this papal
bull as the basis of Ecclesiastical authority of Henry VIII. This Crown was secretly
granted to England in the collection and “reaping” of lost souls. The Crown was lost in
1816, due to the deliberate bankruptcy of England, and granted to the Temple Bar which
became known as the Crown Bar, or simply the Crown. The Bar Associations have since
been responsible for administering the “reaping” of the souls of the lost and damned,
including the registration and collection of Baptismal certificates representing the souls
collected by the Vatican and stored in its vaults.
This 3rd Crown is represented by the 3rd Cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is
baptized. It is the parents’ grant of the Baptismal certificate––title to the soul––to the
church or Registrar. Thus, without legal title over one’s own soul, we will be denied legal
standing and will be treated as things––cargo without souls––upon which the BAR is
now legally able to enforce
Maritime Law
The Cestui Que Vie Trust
A Cestui Que Vie Trust is a fictional concept. It is a Temporary Testamentary Trust, first
created during the reign of Henry VIII of England through the Cestui Que Vie Act of
1540 and updated by Charles II, through the CQV Act of 1666, wherein an Estate may be
effected for the Benefit of a Person presumed lost or abandoned at “sea” and therefore
assumed “dead” after seven (7) years. Additional presumptions, by which such a Trust
may be formed, were added in later statutes to include bankrupts, minors, incompetents,
mortgages, and private companies. The original purpose of a CQV Trust was to form a
temporary Estate for the benefit of another because some event, state of affairs, or
condition prevented them from claiming their status as living, competent, and present,
before a competent authority. Therefore, any claims, history, statutes, or arguments that
deviate in terms of the origin and function of a CQV Trust, as pronounced by these
canons, is false and automatically null and void.

A Beneficiary under Estate may be either a Beneficiary or a CQV Trust. When a
Beneficiary loses direct benefit of any Property of the higher Estate placed in a CQV
Trust on his behalf, he do not “own” the CQV Trust; he is only the beneficiary of what
the Trustees of the CQV Trust choose to provide. As all CQV Trusts are created on
presumption, based upon original purpose and function, such a Trust cannot be created if
these presumptions can be proven not to exist.
Since 1933, when a child is borne in a State (Estate) under inferior Roman law, three (3)
Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts are created upon certain presumptions specifically designed to
deny, forever, the child any rights of Real Property, any Rights to be free, and any Rights
to be known as man or woman, rather than a creature or animal, by claiming and
possessing their Soul or Spirit.
The Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate willingly and knowingly:
1. convey the beneficial entitlements of the child, as Beneficiary, into the 1st Cestui Que
(Vie) Trust in the form of a Registry Number by registering the Name, thereby also
creating the Corporate Person and denying the child any rights to Real Property; and,
2. claim the baby as chattel to the Estate. The slave baby contract is then created by
honoring the ancient tradition of either having the ink impression of the baby’s feet onto
the live birth record, or a drop of its blood, as well as tricking the parents to signing the
baby away through the deceitful legal meanings on the live birth record which is a
promissory note, converted into a slave bond, sold to the private reserve bank of the
estate, and then conveyed into a 2nd and separate CQV Trust, per child, owned by the
bank. When the promissory note reaches maturity and the bank is unable to “seize” the
slave child, a maritime lien is lawfully issued to “salvage” the lost property and is
monetized as currency issued in series against the CQV Trust.
3. claim the child’s soul via the Baptismal Certificate. Since 1540 and the creation of the
1st CQV Act, deriving its power from the Papal Bull of Roman Cult leader Pope Paul III,
1540, when a child is baptized and a Baptismal Certificate is issued, the parents have
gifted, granted, and conveyed the soul of the baby to a “3rd” CQV Trust owned by
Roman Cult, which has held this valuable property in its vaults ever since. Since 1815,
this 3rd Crown of the Roman Cult and 3rd CQV Trust representing Ecclesiastical
Property has been managed by the BAR as the reconstituted “Galla” responsible, as Grim
Reapers, for reaping the souls.
Each Cestui Que Vie Trust, created since 1933, represents one of the 3 Crowns
representing the three claims of property of the Roman Cult: Real Property (on Earth),
Personal Property (body), and Ecclesiastical Property (soul). Each corresponds exactly to
the three forms of law available to the Galla of the BAR Courts: corporate commercial
law (judge is the ‘landlord’), maritime and canon law (judge is the banker), and Talmudic
law (judge is the priest).
What is the real power of a court ‘judge’?
Given what has been revealed about the foundations of Roman Law, what is the real
hidden power of a judge when we face court? Is it their superior knowledge of process
and procedure or of magic? Or is it something simpler and far more obvious?
It is unfortunate that much of the excitement about Estates and Executors has deliberately
not revealed that an Estate, by definition, has to belong to a Trust––to be specific, a
Testamentary Trust or CQV Trust. When we receive legal paper or have to appear in
court, it is these same CQV Trusts which have our rights converted into the property

contained within them. Instead of being the Trustee, or the Executor, or Administrator,
we are merely the Beneficiary of each CQV Trust, granted only beneficial and equitable
use of certain property, never legal title. So if the Roman Legal System assumes we are
merely the beneficiary of these CQV Trusts, when we go to court, who represents the
Trustee and Office of Executor? We all know that all cases are based upon the judge’s
discretion which often defies procedures, statutes, and maxims of law. Well, they are
doing what any Trustee or Executor, administering a trust in the presence of the
beneficiary, can do under Roman Law and all the statutes, maxims, and procedures are
really for show because under the principles of Trust Law, as first formed by the Roman
Cult, a Trustee has a wide latitude, including the ability to correct any procedural
mistakes, by obtaining the implied or tacit consent of the beneficiary, to obviate any
mistakes. The judge is the real and legal Name. The judge is the trust, itself. We are the
mirror image to them––the ghost––the dead. It is high sorcery, trickery, and subterfuge
that has remained “legal” for far too long. Spread the word.
Conference call about the ‘name’ with Vic:
http://ia600306.us.archive.org/11/items/PayItForwardConferenceCall07122010/Pay-it-
forward-ConfCall07-12-2010.mp3
Frank O’Collins:

Money & Justice (p.s. You are already dead!):

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s